Loading...
Pubblicazioni Scientifiche
Filtri di ricerca 2 risultati
Pubblicazioni per anno
Benchmarking tree species classification from proximally sensed laser scanning data: Introducing the FOR-species20K dataset
Puliti
,
Stefano
,
Lines
,
Emily R.
,
Müllerová
,
Jana
,
Frey
,
Julian
,
Schindler
,
Zoe
,
Straker
,
Adrian
,
Allen
,
Matthew J.
,
Winiwarter
,
Lukas
,
Rehush
,
Nataliia
,
Hristova
,
Hristina S.
,
Murray
,
Brent A.
,
Calders
,
Kim
,
Coops
,
Nicholas C.
,
Höfle
,
Bernhard
,
Irwin
,
Liam A.K.
,
Junttila
,
Samuli
,
Kruček
,
Martin
,
Krok
,
G.
,
Král
,
Kamil
,
Levick
,
Shaun R.
,
Lück
,
Linda
,
Missarov
,
Azim
,
Mokroš
,
M.
,
Owen
,
Harry Jon Foord
,
Stereńczak
,
Krzysztof Jan
,
Pitkänen
,
Timo P.
,
Puletti
,
Nicola
,
Saarinen
,
Ninni
,
Hopkinson
,
Chris Dennis
,
Terryn
,
Louise
,
Torresan
,
C.
,
Tomelleri
,
Enrico
,
Weiser
,
Hannah
,
Astrup
,
Rasmus
Mostra abstract
Proximally sensed laser scanning presents new opportunities for automated forest ecosystem data capture. However, a gap remains in deriving ecologically pertinent information, such as tree species, without additional ground data. Artificial intelligence approaches, particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise towards automation. Progress has been limited by the lack of large, diverse, and, most importantly, openly available labelled single-tree point cloud datasets. This has hindered both (1) the robustness of the DL models across varying data types (platforms and sensors) and (2) the ability to effectively track progress, thereby slowing the convergence towards best practice for species classification. To address the above limitations, we compiled the FOR-species20K benchmark dataset, consisting of individual tree point clouds captured using proximally sensed laser scanning data from terrestrial (TLS), mobile (MLS) and drone laser scanning (ULS). Compiled collaboratively, the dataset includes data collected in forests mainly across Europe, covering Mediterranean, temperate and boreal biogeographic regions. It includes scattered tree data from other continents, totaling over 20,000 trees of 33 species and covering a wide range of tree sizes and forms. Alongside the release of FOR-species20K, we benchmarked seven leading DL models for individual tree species classification, including both point cloud (PointNet++, MinkNet, MLP-Mixer, DGCNNs) and multi-view 2D-based methods (SimpleView, DetailView, YOLOv5). 2D Image-based models had, on average, higher overall accuracy (0.77) than 3D point cloud-based models (0.72). Notably, the performance was consistently >0.8 across scanning platforms and sensors, offering versatility in deployment. The top-scoring model, DetailView, demonstrated robustness to training data imbalances and effectively generalized across tree sizes. The FOR-species20K dataset represents an important asset for developing and benchmarking DL models for individual tree species classification using proximally sensed laser scanning data. As such, it serves as a crucial foundation for future efforts to classify accurately and map tree species at various scales using laser scanning technology, as it provides the complete code base, dataset, and an initial baseline representative of the current state-of-the-art of point cloud tree species classification methods. © 2025 The Author(s). Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands
Giannetti
,
Francesca
,
Puletti
,
Nicola
,
Quatrini
,
Valerio
,
Travaglini
,
Davide
,
Bottalico
,
Francesca
,
Corona
,
P.
,
Chirici
,
Gherardo
Mostra abstract
The development of laser scanning technologies has gradually modified methods for forest mensuration and inventory. The main objective of this study is to assess the potential of integrating ALS and TLS data in a complex mixed Mediterranean forest for assessing a set of five single-tree attributes: tree position (TP), stem diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (TH), crown base height (CBH) and crown projection area radii (CPAR). Four different point clouds were used: from ZEB1, a hand-held mobile laser scanner (HMLS), and from FARO® FOCUS 3D, a static terrestrial laser scanner (TLS), both alone or in combination with ALS. The precision of single-tree predictions, in terms of bias and root mean square error, was evaluated against data recorded manually in the field with traditional instruments. We found that: (i) TLS and HMLS have excellent comparable performances for the estimation of TP, DBH and CPAR; (ii) TH was correctly assessed by TLS, while the accuracy by HMLS was lower; (iii) CBH was the most difficult attribute to be reliably assessed and (iv) the integration with ALS increased the performance of the assessment of TH and CPAR with both HMLS and TLS. © 2018, © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.