Loading...
Pubblicazioni Scientifiche
Filtri di ricerca 2 risultati
Pubblicazioni per anno
Wall-to-Wall Mapping of Forest Biomass and Wood Volume Increment in Italy
Giannetti
,
Francesca
,
Chirici
,
Gherardo
,
Vangi
,
Elia
,
Corona
,
P.
,
Maselli
,
Fabio
,
Chiesi
,
Marta
,
D'Amico
,
Giovanni
,
Puletti
,
Nicola
Mostra abstract
Several political initiatives aim to achieve net-zero emissions by the middle of the twenty-first century. In this context, forests are crucial as a carbon sink to store unavoidable emissions. Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of forest ecosystems is pivotal to the availability of accurate forest variable estimates for supporting international reporting and appropriate forest management strategies. Spatially explicit estimates are even more important for Mediterranean countries such as Italy, where the capacity of forests to act as sinks is decreasing due to climate change. This study aimed to develop a spatial approach to obtain high-resolution maps of Italian forest above-ground biomass (ITA-BIO) and current annual volume increment (ITA-CAI), based on remotely sensed and meteorological data. The ITA-BIO estimates were compared with those obtained with two available biomass maps developed in the framework of two international projects (i.e., the Joint Research Center and the European Space Agency biomass maps, namely, JRC-BIO and ESA-BIO). The estimates from ITA-BIO, JRC-BIO, ESA-BIO, and ITA-CAI were compared with the 2nd Italian NFI (INFC) official estimates at regional level (NUT2). The estimates from ITA-BIO are in good agreement with the INFC estimates (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95, mean difference = 3.8 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), while for JRC-BIO and ESA-BIO, the estimates show R<sup>2</sup> of 0.90 and 0.70, respectively, and mean differences of 13.5 and of 21.8 t ha<sup>−1</sup> with respect to the INFC estimates. ITA-CAI estimates are also in good agreement with the INFC estimates (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.93), even if they tend to be slightly biased. The produced maps are hosted on a web-based forest resources management Decision Support System developed under the project AGRIDIGIT (ForestView) and represent a key element in supporting the new Green Deal in Italy, the European Forest Strategy 2030 and the Italian Forest Strategy. © 2022 by the authors.
A deep learning approach for automatic mapping of poplar plantations using Sentinel-2 imagery
D'Amico
,
Giovanni
,
Francini
,
Saverio
,
Giannetti
,
Francesca
,
Vangi
,
Elia
,
Travaglini
,
Davide
,
Chianucci
,
Francesco
,
Mattioli
,
Walter
,
Grotti
,
Mirko
,
Puletti
,
Nicola
,
Corona
,
P.
,
Chirici
,
Gherardo
deep learning
big data
forest tree crops
fully connected neural networks
multitemporal classification
tree species mapping
Mostra abstract
Poplars are one of the most widespread fast-growing tree species used for forest plantations. Owing to their distinct features (fast growth and short rotation) and the dependency on the timber price market, poplar plantations are characterized by large inter-annual fluctuations in their extent and distribution. Therefore, monitoring poplar plantations requires a frequent update of information–not feasible by National Forest Inventories due to their periodicity–achievable by remote sensing systems applications. In particular, the new Sentinel-2 mission, with a revisiting period of 5 days, represents a potentially efficient tool for meeting this need. In this paper, we present a deep learning approach for mapping poplar plantations using Sentinel-2 time series. A reference dataset of poplar plantations was available for a large study area of more than 46,000 km<sup>2</sup> in Northern Italy and served as training and testing data. Two classification methods were compared: (1) a fully connected neural network (also called multilayer perceptron), and (2) a traditional logistic regression. The performance of the two approaches was estimated through bootstrapping procedure with a confidence interval of 99%. Results indicated for deep learning an omission error rate of 2.77%±2.76%, showing improvements compared to logistic regression, omission error rate = 8.91%±4.79%. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.