Loading...
Pubblicazioni Scientifiche
Filtri di ricerca 6 risultati
Pubblicazioni per anno
Above-ground biomass prediction by Sentinel-1 multitemporal data in central Italy with integration of ALOS2 and Sentinel-2 data
Vaglio Laurin
,
Gaia
,
Balling
,
Johannes
,
Corona
,
P.
,
Mattioli
,
Walter
,
Papale
,
Dario
,
Puletti
,
Nicola
,
Rizzo
,
Maria
,
Truckenbrodt
,
John
,
Urban
,
Marcel
Mostra abstract
The objective of this research is to test Sentinel-1 SAR multitemporal data, supported by multispectral and SAR data at other wavelengths, for fine-scale mapping of above-ground biomass (AGB) at the provincial level in a Mediterranean forested landscape. The regression results indicate good accuracy of prediction (R2=0.7) using integrated sensors when an upper bound of 400Mg ha-1 is used in modeling. Multitemporal SAR information was relevant, allowing the selection of optimal Sentinel-1 data, as broadleaf forests showed a different response in backscatter throughout the year. Similar accuracy in predictions was obtained when using SAR multifrequency data or joint SAR and optical data. Predictions based on SAR data were more conservative, and in line with those from an independent sample from the National Forest Inventory, than those based on joint data types. The potential of S1 data in predicting AGB can possibly be improved if models are developed per specific groups (deciduous or evergreen species) or forest types and using a larger range of ground data. Overall, this research shows the usefulness of Sentinel-1 data to map biomass at very high resolution for local study and at considerable carbon density. © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Continental Contrasts in Climate Extremes That Control Tree Fecundity
Clark
,
James S.
,
Andrus
,
Robert A.
,
Arianoutsou
,
Margarita
,
Ascoli
,
Davide
,
Bergeron
,
Yves
,
Bogdziewicz
,
Michał
,
Boivin
,
Thomas
,
Bonal
,
Raúl
,
Caignard
,
Thomas
,
Cailleret
,
Maxime
,
Calama
,
Rafael A.
,
Camarero
,
Jesús Julio
,
Chianucci
,
Francesco
,
Cienciala
,
Emil
,
Courbaud
,
Benoít
,
Delzon
,
Sylvain
,
Dietze
,
Michael C.
,
Espelta
,
Josep Maria
,
Fady
,
Bruno
,
Fyllas
,
Nikolaos M.
,
Gilbert
,
Gregory S.
,
Gratzer
,
Georg
,
Guignabert
,
Arthur
,
Hacket-Pain
,
Andrew J.
,
Hampe
,
Arndt
,
Hanley
,
Mick E.
,
Hille Ris Lambers
,
Janneke
,
Holik
,
Jan
,
Hoshizaki
,
K.
,
Hu
,
Miao
,
Ibáñez
,
Inés
,
Işık
,
Fatih
,
Jenkins
,
Lauren
,
Johnstone
,
Jill F.
,
Journé
,
Valentin
,
Kadioglu
,
Alper Kaan
,
Kızılaslan
,
İrem Sena
,
Knops
,
Johannes Michael Hubertus
,
Kobe
,
Richard K.
,
Köse
,
Nesibe
,
Külah
,
Eylül U.
,
Kunstler
,
Georges
,
LaMontagne
,
Jalene M.
,
Ledwoń
,
Mateusz
,
Lehtonen
,
Aleksi
,
Loewe-Muñoz
,
Verónica F.
,
Lutz
,
James A.
,
Mårell
,
Anders
,
Meyer
,
Kira
,
Moran
,
Emily V.
,
Motta
,
Renzo
,
Myers
,
Jonathan A.
,
Nagel
,
Thomas A.
,
Pérez-Ramos
,
Ignacio M.
,
Piechnik
,
Łukasz
,
Podgórski
,
Tomasz
,
Poulton-Kamakura
,
Renata
,
Qiu
,
Tong
,
Redmond
,
Miranda D.
,
Reid
,
Chantal D.
,
Rodman
,
Kyle C.
,
Rodríguez-Sánchez
,
Francisco
,
Šamonil
,
Pavel
,
Šebeň
,
Vladimír
,
Seget
,
Barbara
,
Sharma
,
Shubhi
,
Socha
,
Jarosław Ł.
,
Steele
,
Michael A.
,
Straub
,
Jacob N.
,
Sutton
,
Samantha
,
Thomas
,
Peter A.
,
Vacchiano
,
Giorgio
,
Venner
,
Marie Claude
,
Venner
,
Samuel
,
Zavala
,
Miguel A.
,
Zheng
,
Shiqi
,
Żywiec
,
Magdalena
Mostra abstract
In 2023, more than half of olive harvests (Olea europaea) across Spain, Greece, and Türkiye were lost to drought. The same year late freeze destroyed 90% of the peach crop (Prunus persica) on the Georgia Piedmont and the apple crop (Malus domestica) in central New York, Vermont, and southern Quebec. Climate extremes now rank with the costliest threats to agriculture, but their role in forest recovery from diebacks that are happening globally is unknown for lack of tree fecundity estimates in forests. Tolerance of climate extremes could depend on past exposure but constrained by phylogenetic conservatism. We report a continental scale analysis of climate extremes and forest fecundity across North America and Europe showing that responses to late freeze and drought are happening now. Species differences are not explained by the traits typically included in ecological studies and they are weakly associated with phylogeny. Late freeze, that is, freezing temperatures that follow the onset of flower development in spring, is shown to be “normal” in North America, but not Europe, potentially explaining failed seed production due to delayed onset and the resultant shorter growing period by North American transplants dating back at least to the 18th century. Drought has thus far had the greatest impacts in dry forested regions, but here too, species differences are not explained by traditional trait values. If responses have been buffered from drought and late freeze by past exposure, acclimation and local adaptation prove inadequate as extremes intensify. © 2026 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
The Relationship Between Maturation Size and Maximum Tree Size From Tropical to Boreal Climates
Journé
,
Valentin
,
Bogdziewicz
,
Michał
,
Courbaud
,
Benoít
,
Kunstler
,
Georges
,
Qiu
,
Tong
,
Aravena Acuña
,
Marie Claire
,
Ascoli
,
Davide
,
Bergeron
,
Yves
,
Berveiller
,
Daniel
,
Boivin
,
Thomas
,
Bonal
,
Raúl
,
Caignard
,
Thomas
,
Cailleret
,
Maxime
,
Calama
,
Rafael A.
,
Camarero
,
Jesús Julio
,
Chang-Yang
,
Chia Hao
,
Chave
,
Jérôme
,
Chianucci
,
Francesco
,
Curt
,
Thomas
,
Cutini
,
Andrea
,
Das
,
Adrian J.
,
Daskalakou
,
Evangelia N.
,
Davi
,
Hendrik
,
Delpierre
,
Nicolas
,
Delzon
,
Sylvain
,
Dietze
,
Michael C.
,
Calderon
,
Sergio Donoso
,
Dormont
,
Laurent
,
Espelta
,
Josep Maria
,
Farfan-Rios
,
William R.
,
Fenner
,
Michael
,
Franklin
,
Jerry F.
,
Gehring
,
Catherine A.
,
Gilbert
,
Gregory S.
,
Gratzer
,
Georg
,
Greenberg
,
Cathryn H.
,
Guignabert
,
Arthur
,
Guo
,
Qinfeng
,
Hacket-Pain
,
Andrew J.
,
Hampe
,
Arndt
,
Han
,
Qingmin
,
Hanley
,
Mick E.
,
Hille Ris Lambers
,
Janneke
,
Holik
,
Jan
,
Hoshizaki
,
K.
,
Ibáñez
,
Inés
,
Johnstone
,
Jill F.
,
Knops
,
Johannes Michael Hubertus
,
Kobe
,
Richard K.
,
Kurokawa
,
Hiroko
,
Lageard
,
Jonathan G.A.
,
LaMontagne
,
Jalene M.
,
Ledwoń
,
Mateusz
,
Lefèvre
,
François
,
Leininger
,
Theodor D.
,
Limousin
,
Jean Marc
,
Lutz
,
James A.
,
Macias
,
Diana S.
,
Mårell
,
Anders
,
McIntire
,
Eliot J.B.
,
Moran
,
Emily V.
,
Motta
,
Renzo
,
Myers
,
Jonathan A.
,
Nagel
,
Thomas A.
,
Naoe
,
Shoji
,
Noguchi
,
Mahoko
,
Norghauer
,
Julian M.
,
Oguro
,
Michio
,
Ourcival
,
Jean Marc
,
Parmenter
,
Robert R.
,
Pearse
,
Ian S.
,
Pérez-Ramos
,
Ignacio M.
,
Piechnik
,
Łukasz
,
Podgórski
,
Tomasz
,
Poulsen
,
John R.
,
Redmond
,
Miranda D.
,
Reid
,
Chantal D.
,
Šamonil
,
Pavel
,
Scher
,
C. Lane
,
Schlesinger
,
William H.
,
Seget
,
Barbara
,
Sharma
,
Shubhi
,
Shibata
,
Mitsue
,
Silman
,
Miles R.
,
Steele
,
Michael A.
,
Stephenson
,
Nathan L.
,
Straub
,
Jacob N.
,
Sutton
,
Samantha
,
Swenson
,
Jennifer J.
,
Swift
,
Margaret
,
Thomas
,
Peter A.
,
Uríarte
,
María
,
Vacchiano
,
Giorgio
,
Whipple
,
Amy Vaughn
,
Whitham
,
Thomas G.
,
Wright
,
Stuart Joseph
,
Zhu
,
Kai
,
Zimmerman
,
Jess K.
,
Żywiec
,
Magdalena
,
Clark
,
James S.
Mostra abstract
The fundamental trade-off between current and future reproduction has long been considered to result in a tendency for species that can grow large to begin reproduction at a larger size. Due to the prolonged time required to reach maturity, estimates of tree maturation size remain very rare and we lack a global view on the generality and the shape of this trade-off. Using seed production from five continents, we estimate tree maturation sizes for 486 tree species spanning tropical to boreal climates. Results show that a species' maturation size increases with maximum size, but in a non-proportional way: the largest species begin reproduction at smaller sizes than would be expected if maturation were simply proportional to maximum size. Furthermore, the decrease in relative maturation size is steepest in cold climates. These findings on maturation size drivers are key to accurately represent forests' responses to disturbance and climate change. © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Masting is uncommon in trees that depend on mutualist dispersers in the context of global climate and fertility gradients
Qiu
,
Tong
,
Aravena Acuña
,
Marie Claire
,
Ascoli
,
Davide
,
Bergeron
,
Yves
,
Bogdziewicz
,
Michał
,
Boivin
,
Thomas
,
Bonal
,
Raúl
,
Caignard
,
Thomas
,
Cailleret
,
Maxime
,
Calama
,
Rafael A.
,
Calderon
,
Sergio Donoso
,
Camarero
,
Jesús Julio
,
Chang-Yang
,
Chia Hao
,
Chave
,
Jérôme
,
Chianucci
,
Francesco
,
Courbaud
,
Benoít
,
Cutini
,
Andrea
,
Das
,
Adrian J.
,
Delpierre
,
Nicolas
,
Delzon
,
Sylvain
,
Dietze
,
Michael C.
,
Dormont
,
Laurent
,
Espelta
,
Josep Maria
,
Fahey
,
Timothy J.
,
Farfan-Rios
,
William R.
,
Franklin
,
Jerry F.
,
Gehring
,
Catherine A.
,
Gilbert
,
Gregory S.
,
Gratzer
,
Georg
,
Greenberg
,
Cathryn H.
,
Guignabert
,
Arthur
,
Guo
,
Qinfeng
,
Hacket-Pain
,
Andrew J.
,
Hampe
,
Arndt
,
Han
,
Qingmin
,
Holik
,
Jan
,
Hoshizaki
,
K.
,
Ibáñez
,
Inés
,
Johnstone
,
Jill F.
,
Journé
,
Valentin
,
Kitzberger
,
Thomas A.
,
Knops
,
Johannes Michael Hubertus
,
Kunstler
,
Georges
,
Kurokawa
,
Hiroko
,
Lageard
,
Jonathan G.A.
,
LaMontagne
,
Jalene M.
,
Lefèvre
,
François
,
Leininger
,
Theodor D.
,
Limousin
,
Jean Marc
,
Lutz
,
James A.
,
Macias
,
Diana S.
,
Mårell
,
Anders
,
McIntire
,
Eliot J.B.
,
Moore
,
Christopher M.
,
Moran
,
Emily V.
,
Motta
,
Renzo
,
Myers
,
Jonathan A.
,
Nagel
,
Thomas A.
,
Naoe
,
Shoji
,
Noguchi
,
Mahoko
,
Oguro
,
Michio
,
Parmenter
,
Robert R.
,
Pearse
,
Ian S.
,
Pérez-Ramos
,
Ignacio M.
,
Piechnik
,
Łukasz
,
Podgórski
,
Tomasz
,
Poulsen
,
John R.
,
Redmond
,
Miranda D.
,
Reid
,
Chantal D.
,
Rodman
,
Kyle C.
,
Rodríguez-Sánchez
,
Francisco
,
Šamonil
,
Pavel
,
Sanguinetti
,
Javier D.
,
Scher
,
C. Lane
,
Seget
,
Barbara
,
Sharma
,
Shubhi
,
Shibata
,
Mitsue
,
Silman
,
Miles R.
,
Steele
,
Michael A.
,
Stephenson
,
Nathan L.
,
Straub
,
Jacob N.
,
Sutton
,
Samantha
,
Swenson
,
Jennifer J.
,
Swift
,
Margaret
,
Thomas
,
Peter A.
,
Uríarte
,
María
,
Vacchiano
,
Giorgio
,
Whipple
,
Amy Vaughn
,
Whitham
,
Thomas G.
,
Wion
,
Andreas P.
,
Wright
,
Stuart Joseph
,
Zhu
,
Kai
,
Zimmerman
,
Jess K.
,
Żywiec
,
Magdalena
,
Clark
,
James S.
Mostra abstract
The benefits of masting (volatile, quasi-synchronous seed production at lagged intervals) include satiation of seed predators, but these benefits come with a cost to mutualist pollen and seed dispersers. If the evolution of masting represents a balance between these benefits and costs, we expect mast avoidance in species that are heavily reliant on mutualist dispersers. These effects play out in the context of variable climate and site fertility among species that vary widely in nutrient demand. Meta-analyses of published data have focused on variation at the population scale, thus omitting periodicity within trees and synchronicity between trees. From raw data on 12 million tree-years worldwide, we quantified three components of masting that have not previously been analysed together: (i) volatility, defined as the frequency-weighted year-to-year variation; (ii) periodicity, representing the lag between high-seed years; and (iii) synchronicity, indicating the tree-to-tree correlation. Results show that mast avoidance (low volatility and low synchronicity) by species dependent on mutualist dispersers explains more variation than any other effect. Nutrient-demanding species have low volatility, and species that are most common on nutrient-rich and warm/wet sites exhibit short periods. The prevalence of masting in cold/dry sites coincides with climatic conditions where dependence on vertebrate dispersers is less common than in the wet tropics. Mutualist dispersers neutralize the benefits of masting for predator satiation, further balancing the effects of climate, site fertility and nutrient demands. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Linking seed size and number to trait syndromes in trees
Bogdziewicz
,
Michał
,
Aravena Acuña
,
Marie Claire
,
Andrus
,
Robert A.
,
Ascoli
,
Davide
,
Bergeron
,
Yves
,
Brveiller
,
Daniel
,
Boivin
,
Thomas
,
Bonal
,
Raúl
,
Caignard
,
Thomas
,
Cailleret
,
Maxime
,
Calama
,
Rafael A.
,
Calderon
,
Sergio Donoso
,
Camarero
,
Jesús Julio
,
Chang-Yang
,
Chia Hao
,
Chave
,
Jérôme
,
Chianucci
,
Francesco
,
Cleavitt
,
Natalie L.
,
Courbaud
,
Benoít
,
Cutini
,
Andrea
,
Curt
,
Thomas
,
Das
,
Adrian J.
,
Davi
,
Hendrik
,
Delpierre
,
Nicolas
,
Delzon
,
Sylvain
,
Dietze
,
Michael C.
,
Dormont
,
Laurent
,
Farfan-Rios
,
William R.
,
Gehring
,
Catherine A.
,
Gilbert
,
Gregory S.
,
Gratzer
,
Georg
,
Greenberg
,
Cathryn H.
,
Guignabert
,
Arthur
,
Guo
,
Qinfeng
,
Hacket-Pain
,
Andrew J.
,
Hampe
,
Arndt
,
Han
,
Qingmin
,
Hoshizaki
,
K.
,
Ibáñez
,
Inés
,
Johnstone
,
Jill F.
,
Journé
,
Valentin
,
Kitzberger
,
Thomas A.
,
Knops
,
Johannes Michael Hubertus
,
Kunstler
,
Georges
,
Kobe
,
Richard K.
,
Lageard
,
Jonathan G.A.
,
LaMontagne
,
Jalene M.
,
Ledwoń
,
Mateusz
,
Leininger
,
Theodor D.
,
Limousin
,
Jean Marc
,
Lutz
,
James A.
,
Macias
,
Diana S.
,
Mårell
,
Anders
,
McIntire
,
Eliot J.B.
,
Moran
,
Emily V.
,
Motta
,
Renzo
,
Myers
,
Jonathan A.
,
Nagel
,
Thomas A.
,
Naoe
,
Shoji
,
Noguchi
,
Mahoko
,
Oguro
,
Michio
,
Kurokawa
,
Hiroko
,
Ourcival
,
Jean Marc
,
Parmenter
,
Robert R.
,
Pérez-Ramos
,
Ignacio M.
,
Piechnik
,
Łukasz
,
Podgórski
,
Tomasz
,
Poulsen
,
John R.
,
Qiu
,
Tong
,
Redmond
,
Miranda D.
,
Reid
,
Chantal D.
,
Rodman
,
Kyle C.
,
Šamonil
,
Pavel
,
Holik
,
Jan
,
Scher
,
C. Lane
,
van Marle
,
Harald Schmidt
,
Seget
,
Barbara
,
Shibata
,
Mitsue
,
Sharma
,
Shubhi
,
Silman
,
Miles R.
,
Steele
,
Michael A.
,
Straub
,
Jacob N.
,
Sun
,
I. Fang
,
Sutton
,
Samantha
,
Swenson
,
Jennifer J.
,
Thomas
,
Peter A.
,
Uríarte
,
María
,
Vacchiano
,
Giorgio
,
Veblen
,
Thomas Thorstein
,
Wright
,
Boyd R.
,
Wright
,
Stuart Joseph
,
Whitham
,
Thomas G.
,
Zhu
,
Kai
,
Zimmerman
,
Jess K.
,
Żywiec
,
Magdalena
,
Clark
,
James S.
Mostra abstract
Aim: Our understanding of the mechanisms that maintain forest diversity under changing climate can benefit from knowledge about traits that are closely linked to fitness. We tested whether the link between traits and seed number and seed size is consistent with two hypotheses, termed the leaf economics spectrum and the plant size syndrome, or whether reproduction represents an independent dimension related to a seed size–seed number trade-off. Location: Most of the data come from Europe, North and Central America and East Asia. A minority of the data come from South America, Africa and Australia. Time period: 1960–2022. Major taxa studied: Trees. Methods: We gathered 12 million observations of the number of seeds produced in 784 tree species. We estimated the number of seeds produced by individual trees and scaled it up to the species level. Next, we used principal components analysis and generalized joint attribute modelling (GJAM) to map seed number and size on the tree traits spectrum. Results: Incorporating seed size and number into trait analysis while controlling for environment and phylogeny with GJAM exposes relationships in trees that might otherwise remain hidden. Production of the large total biomass of seeds [product of seed number and seed size; hereafter, species seed productivity (SSP)] is associated with high leaf area, low foliar nitrogen, low specific leaf area (SLA) and dense wood. Production of high seed numbers is associated with small seeds produced by nutrient-demanding species with softwood, small leaves and high SLA. Trait covariation is consistent with opposing strategies: one fast-growing, early successional, with high dispersal, and the other slow-growing, stress-tolerant, that recruit in shaded conditions. Main conclusions: Earth system models currently assume that reproductive allocation is indifferent among plant functional types. Easily measurable seed size is a strong predictor of the seed number and species seed productivity. The connection of SSP with the functional traits can form the first basis of improved fecundity prediction across global forests. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests
Burrascano
,
Sabina
,
Trentanovi
,
Giovanni
,
Paillet
,
Yoan
,
Heilmann-Clausen
,
Jacob
,
Giordani
,
P.
,
Bagella
,
Simonetta
,
Bravo-Oviedo
,
Andrés
,
Campagnaro
,
Thomas
,
Campanaro
,
Alessandro
,
Chianucci
,
Francesco
,
de Smedt
,
Pallieter
,
Itziar
,
García Mijangos
,
Matošević
,
Dinka
,
Sitzia
,
Tommaso
,
Aszalós
,
Réka
,
Brazaitis
,
Gediminas
,
Cutini
,
Andrea
,
D'Andrea
,
Ettore
,
Doerfler
,
Inken
,
Hofmeister
,
Jeňýk
,
Hošek
,
Jan
,
Janssen
,
Philippe
,
Kepfer-Rojas
,
Sebastian
,
Korboulewsky
,
Nathalie
,
Kozák
,
Daniel
,
Lachat
,
Thibault
,
Lõhmus
,
Asko
,
López
,
Rosana
,
Mårell
,
Anders
,
Matula
,
Radim
,
Mikoláš
,
Martin
,
Munzi
,
Silvana
,
Nordén
,
Björn
,
Pärtel
,
Meelis
,
Penner
,
Johannes
,
Runnel
,
Kadri
,
Schall
,
Peter
,
Svoboda
,
Miroslav
,
Tinya
,
Flóra
,
Ujházyová
,
Mariana
,
Vandekerkhove
,
Kris
,
Verheyen
,
Kris
,
Xystrakis
,
Fotios
,
Ódor
,
Péter
Mostra abstract
Forests host most terrestrial biodiversity and their sustainable management is crucial to halt biodiversity loss. Although scientific evidence indicates that sustainable forest management (SFM) should be assessed by monitoring multi-taxon biodiversity, most current SFM criteria and indicators account only for trees or consider indirect biodiversity proxies. Several projects performed multi-taxon sampling to investigate the effects of forest management on biodiversity, but the large variability of their sampling approaches hampers the identification of general trends, and limits broad-scale inference for designing SFM. Here we address the need of common sampling protocols for forest structure and multi-taxon biodiversity to be used at broad spatial scales. We established a network of researchers involved in 41 projects on forest multi-taxon biodiversity across 13 European countries. The network data structure comprised the assessment of at least three taxa, and the measurement of forest stand structure in the same plots or stands. We mapped the sampling approaches to multi-taxon biodiversity, standing trees and deadwood, and used this overview to provide operational answers to two simple, yet crucial, questions: what to sample? How to sample? The most commonly sampled taxonomic groups are vascular plants (83% of datasets), beetles (80%), lichens (66%), birds (66%), fungi (61%), bryophytes (49%). They cover different forest structures and habitats, with a limited focus on soil, litter and forest canopy. Notwithstanding the common goal of assessing forest management effects on biodiversity, sampling approaches differed widely within and among taxonomic groups. Differences derive from sampling units (plots size, use of stand vs. plot scale), and from the focus on different substrates or functional groups of organisms. Sampling methods for standing trees and lying deadwood were relatively homogeneous and focused on volume calculations, but with a great variability in sampling units and diameter thresholds. We developed a handbook of sampling methods (SI 3) aimed at the greatest possible comparability across taxonomic groups and studies as a basis for European-wide biodiversity monitoring programs, robust understanding of biodiversity response to forest structure and management, and the identification of direct indicators of SFM. © 2021 The Authors