Accurate estimates of leaf area index (L) are strongly required for modelling ecophysiological processes within urban forests. The majority of methods available for estimating L is ideally applicable at stand scale and is therefore poorly suitable in urban settings, where trees are typically sparse and isolated. In addition, accurate measurements in urban settings are hindered by proximity of trees to infrastructure elements, which can strongly affect the accuracy of tree canopy analysis.In this study we tested whether digital photography can be used to obtain indirect estimate of L of isolated trees. The sampled species were Platanus orientalis, Liquidambar styraciflua and Juglans regia. Upward-facing photography was used to estimate gap fraction and foliage clumping from images collected in unobstructed (open areas) and obstructed (nearby buildings) settings; two image classification methods provided accurate estimates of gap fraction, based on comparison with measurements obtained from a high quality quantum sensor (LAI-2000). Leveled photography was used to characterize the leaf angle distribution of the examined tree species. L estimates obtained combining the two photographic methods agreed well with direct L measurements obtained from harvesting. We conclude that digital photography is suitable for estimating leaf area in isolated urban trees, due to its simple, fast and cost-effective procedures. Use of vegetation indices allows extending significantly the applicability of the photographic method in urban settings, including green roofs and vertical greenery systems. © 2015 Elsevier GmbH.

Fast and accurate estimates of canopy cover are central for a wide range of agricultural applications and studies. Visual assessment is a traditionally employed method to estimate canopy cover in the field, but it is limited by the costs, subjectivity and non-reproducibility of the produced estimates. Digital photography is a low-cost alternative method. In this study we tested two automated image classification methods, the first one based on a histogram-analysis method (Rosin), the second one based on a combination of a visible vegetation index and the L*a*b* colour space conversion (LAB2), which have both been previously tested in forestry, and a supervised image classification method (Winscanopy), to estimate canopy cover from downward-looking images of agricultural crops. These methods were tested using artificial images with known cover; this allowed exploring the influence of canopy density and object size on canopy cover estimation from photography. The Rosin method provided the best estimates of canopy cover in artificial images, whose accuracy was largely unaffected by variation in canopy density and object size. By contrast, LAB2 systematically overestimated canopy cover, because of the sensitivity of the method to small variations of chromaticity in artificial images. Winscanopy showed good performance when at least two regions per class were manually selected from a representative image. The results were replicated in real images of cultivated aromatic crops. The main findings indicate that digital photography is an effective method to obtain rapid, robust and reproducible measures of canopy cover in downward-looking images of agricultural crops, including aromatic plants. © 2018 IAgrE